If you know me, you know that I am not a violent person. But then, the other day, a murderous thought came to mind. Not quite voices in my head, more like a clarion call, a seasonally appropriate shofar from within the realm of my professional work. “Kill. Kill the word. Innovation. It needs to die.”
Troubling, to me personally, a heavy user of words, to advocate for the death of a word; not to mention the fact that I work part-time adjacent to the Partnerships & Innovation department at the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, and as a consultant for the ROI Community of Jewish Innovators. Most of my professional work involves being in and around what I once explained to someone was “the emerging Jewish innovation sector.” (The person’s response: “Huh?”) My attempt to name projects in this sphere as explanation – G-dcast, Birthright Israel, PresenTense, ROI, Jewcology, Hazon, Sharsheret – didn’t seem to help. I must have sounded like Hagrid, describing mystical creatures at Hogwarts.
A few years back at LimmudLA, I presented on the state of
Jewish innovation, citing
G-dcast, the Mission Minyan, Kehilat Hadar, Moishe
House and Challah for Hunger as examples. A voice of dissent in the room
claimed that these projects were not innovations. G-dcast is “just” the weekly
Torah portion; independent prayer communities are “just” the reinvention of
havurot; Moishe House is “just” group living, like a kibbutz and a fraternity
combined; Challah for Hunger is “just” a bake sale. My argument back was
that the sum of the product itself might not be innovative, but the lens, venue
or methodology used to produce it is creative, in some way “alternative” to the
mainstream culture of Jewish life, or directly reflective of contemporary needs
and concerns, and that it was that kind of work that was emerging under the
term “innovation.”
Continue reading "Approaching “Innovation”: Verbicidal Tendencies " »