This week, philanthropist Michael Steinhardt took the microphone for a speech to a group of philanthropists and Jewish professionals that seemed to condemn Jewish organizations for focusing on discussion and conversation over action. According to TJCTV, the speech "came at an event touting a study claiming Birthright Israel, which was founded in part by Steinhardt, has done quite [...] a lot to combat intermarriage." (You can view the study here, and you may also wish to read "The Birthright Israel Program: Present and Potential Future Impacts.")
In the speech (which you can view in its entirety below), Steinhardt noted the "difference between having dialogue and being right." "In the Jewish world there’s a great deal of focus on dialogue," he said. "A lot of people are “doing their best” and it’s just not so good. It’s accepted, and there’s very little internal dissension."He also points out that the subject of their gathering, Birthright Israel, was "overwhelmingly disliked by the midstream, institutional Jewish world. Most things that are going to change the world are at their inset disliked," he noted, saying that "conversations [...] don’t change the Jewish world. They don’t change the appalling level of education in the non-Orthodox Jewish world." To change that required "something very, very different," he said.
He addressed the "oodles of PhDs" in the Jewish world and called the impact of their work "gornisht" (nothing). "This is an important study that says some significant things. But do you remember any Jewish study meaningfully changing the Jewish world? I don’t. This might. [...] Is the world interested? It takes something very special to create change. Birthright and how we did it created change. Change requires pain, difference, dispute, argument, and unless we’re going to do that, we’re going to be nice and polite and get nowhere."
I don't wholly disagree with Steinhardt - education outside the Orthodox world is definitely lacking, dayschool educations are increasingly prohibitively expensive, and if we only spend our time sitting around talking, nothing gets done. But while Steinhardt points out these issues, I'm not sure what the takeaway is. So, Jewish orgs shouldn't just sit around talking. They should do. But do what? This is a nonspecific call to action. What I would have liked to have heard was a battle cry: "Let's make Jewish education the right of every child, no matter what their financial situation." "Let's collaborate on projects between young Jewish innovators and struggling Jewish institutions." But as it stands, as shocking as it may be to be reprimanded by Michael Steinhardt, the question is still "now what?"



